RESUMO: Introdução: O Escore Finlandês de Risco de Diabetes (FINDRISC) é um instrumento que inicialmente foi desenvolvido para predizer o risco de desenvolver diabetes mellitus tipo 2 em adultos. Esse instrumento é simples, rápido de aplicar, não invasivo e de baixo custo. Os objetivos deste estudo foram descrever o processo de tradução e adaptação transcultural do FINDRISC para o português do Brasil e avaliar a sua confiabilidade teste-reteste. Metodologia: O projeto foi conduzido de acordo com as recomendações dos Princípios de Boas Práticas para o Processo de Tradução e Adaptação Transcultural de Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente desenvolvidas pela ISPOR. Uma vez desenvolvida a versão final em português brasileiro (FINDRISC-Br), realizou-se a avaliação da confiabilidade usando uma amostra não aleatória de 83 indivíduos atendidos em uma unidade de atenção básica. Cada participante foi entrevistado por nutricionistas registradas treinadas em duas ocasiões com intervalo médio de 14 dias. A avaliação da confiabilidade foi realizada por meio da análise do nível de concordância entre as respostas do teste-reteste, utilizando-se o coeficiente kappa de Cohen e o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI). Resultados: As etapas das diretrizes da ISPOR foram seguidas consecutivamente sem maiores problemas. Em relação à avaliação da confiabilidade do teste-reteste, o questionário como um todo apresentou confiabilidade adequada (kappa de Cohen = 0,82; IC95% 0,72 - 0,92 e CCI = 0,94; IC95% 0,91 - 0,96). Conclusão: O FINDRISC foi traduzido e adaptado transculturalmente para o português do Brasil seguindo procedimentos padronizados. O FINDRISC-Br já está disponível para uso e tem potencial para ser usado como ferramenta de rastreamento em diferentes cenários brasileiros.

ABSTRACT: Introduction: The Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) is a tool that was initially developed to predict the risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults. This tool is simple, quick to apply, non-invasive, and low-cost. The aims of this study were to perform a translation and cultural adaptation of the original version of FINDRISC into Brazilian Portuguese and to assess test-retest reliability. Methodology: This work was done following the ISPOR Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures. Once the final Brazilian Portuguese version (FINDRISC-Br) was developed, the reliability assessment was performed using a non-random sample of 83 individuals attending a primary care health center. Each participant was interviewed by trained registered dieticians on two occasions with a mean interval of 14 days. The reliability assessment was performed by analyzing the level of agreement between the test-retest responses of FINDRISC-Br using Cohen’s kappa coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: The steps of ISPOR guidelines were consecutively followed without major problems. Regarding the reliability assessment, the questionnaire as a whole presented adequate reliability (Cohen’s kappa = 0.82, 95%CI 0.72 - 0.92 and ICC = 0.94, 95%CI 0.91 - 0.96). Conclusion: FINDRISC was translated into Brazilian Portuguese and culturally adapted following standard procedures. FINDRISC-Br has thus become available for use and has potential as a screening tool in different Brazilian settings and applications.

RESUMO: Introdução: O Escore Finlandês de Risco de Diabetes (FINDRISC) é um instrumento que inicialmente foi desenvolvido para predizer o risco de desenvolver diabetes mellitus tipo 2 em adultos. Esse instrumento é simples, rápido de aplicar, não invasivo e de baixo custo. Os objetivos deste estudo foram descrever o processo de tradução e adaptação transcultural do FINDRISC para o português do Brasil e avaliar a sua confiabilidade teste-reteste. Metodologia: O projeto foi conduzido de acordo com as recomendações dos Princípios de Boas Práticas para o Processo de Tradução e Adaptação Transcultural de Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente desenvolvidas pela ISPOR. Uma vez desenvolvida a versão final em português brasileiro (FINDRISC-Br), realizou-se a avaliação da confiabilidade usando uma amostra não aleatória de 83 indivíduos atendidos em uma unidade de atenção básica. Cada participante foi entrevistado por nutricionistas registradas treinadas em duas ocasiões com intervalo médio de 14 dias. A avaliação da confiabilidade foi realizada por meio da análise do nível de concordância entre as respostas do teste-reteste, utilizando-se o coeficiente kappa de Cohen e o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI). Resultados: As etapas das diretrizes da ISPOR foram seguidas consecutivamente sem maiores problemas. Em relação à avaliação da confiabilidade do teste-reteste, o questionário como um todo apresentou confiabilidade adequada (kappa de Cohen = 0,82; IC95% 0,72 - 0,92 e CCI = 0,94; IC95% 0,91 - 0,96). Conclusão: O FINDRISC foi traduzido e adaptado transculturalmente para o português do Brasil seguindo procedimentos padronizados. O FINDRISC-Br já está disponível para uso e tem potencial para ser usado como ferramenta de rastreamento em diferentes cenários brasileiros.

ABSTRACT: Introduction: The Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) is a tool that was initially developed to predict the risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults. This tool is simple, quick to apply, non-invasive, and low-cost. The aims of this study were to perform a translation and cultural adaptation of the original version of FINDRISC into Brazilian Portuguese and to assess test-retest reliability. Methodology: This work was done following the ISPOR Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures. Once the final Brazilian Portuguese version (FINDRISC-Br) was developed, the reliability assessment was performed using a non-random sample of 83 individuals attending a primary care health center. Each participant was interviewed by trained registered dieticians on two occasions with a mean interval of 14 days. The reliability assessment was performed by analyzing the level of agreement between the test-retest responses of FINDRISC-Br using Cohen’s kappa coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: The steps of ISPOR guidelines were consecutively followed without major problems. Regarding the reliability assessment, the questionnaire as a whole presented adequate reliability (Cohen’s kappa = 0.82, 95%CI 0.72 - 0.92 and ICC = 0.94, 95%CI 0.91 - 0.96). Conclusion: FINDRISC was translated into Brazilian Portuguese and culturally adapted following standard procedures. FINDRISC-Br has thus become available for use and has potential as a screening tool in different Brazilian settings and applications.

OBJECTIVE. To contribute to the development of a set of quality criteria for patient education and health professionals training that could be applied in European countries. METHODS. Literature review quality criteria, pre-selection based on a comparison of the criteria, peer group and expert based selection of the criteria. RESULTS. 14 quality criteria were selected: goals, rationale, target group, setting, scheduling of the education/training sessions, environmental requirements, qualification of the trainers/educators, core components of the educator/trainer's role, curriculum, education methods, education didactics, monitoring of the effectiveness and quality of the program, implementation level and source of funding. DISCUSSION. A set of preliminary quality criteria for patient education and health professionals training was developed, which could be applied in European countries.

Healthcare systems do not fit well with the "modern" patient, who has a right to autonomy and self-determination. The services that are designed and delivered in policy contexts are not prone to encourage innovation. National Diabetes Plans, defined as "any formal strategy for improving diabetes policy, services and outcomes that encompass structured and integrated or linked activities which are planned and co-ordinated nationally and conducted at the national, regional, and local level", may hold a great potential not only to improve prevention and care for type 2 diabetes, but also for transforming healthcare delivery. Today, changes to adapt healthcare delivery tend to be implemented within existing provider structures, with limited understanding of specific context, structures, processes and potential for change. National Diabetes Plan can be a diagnostic tool for barriers, can be a driver for planning the change, and can help develop capacities and competences that are needed to strengthen healthcare systems to better address health promotion and chronic diseases.

AIM. To present the most common quality criteria in health promotion interventions in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify review articles, health technology assessments and policy reports of evaluated health promotion interventions in T2DM. A descriptive analysis of study characteristics and evaluation criteria are presented. RESULTS. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings indicate that the most common health promotion interventions used in T2DM are initiatives targeting health care professionals. The main ambition of the programs was to increase the collaboration between health care professionals and patients, and between health care centres, program managers and community stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS. This investigation extends our knowledge of the most common health promotion interventions in T2DM and which structure, process and outcome measurements that are reported in such interventions. Future research could usefully explore how the effectiveness of multicomponent and complex interventions may be evaluated and extend the association of these factors into other settings and in relation to other lifestyle related chronic diseases.

OBJECTIVE. Type 2 diabetes can be efficiently prevented by lifestyle intervention provided for people at high diabetes risk. The aim of this paper was to conduct a literature search on existing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes prevention and to collate and present a set of indicators that could be applied in European countries with different health care systems and cultures. METHODS. Scientific and grey literature was searched for relevant studies using electronic databases. We also hand searched previous systematic reviews and reference lists of relevant articles. RESULTS. The only publication identified was the report presenting the results from the IMAGE project. The IMAGE indicators were used as the basis for the proposed indicators. CONCLUSIONS. Publications on quality indicators of diabetes prevention programmes are scarce. The quality indicators presented here are a first step toward the definition of a core set of European indicators to monitor and improve the quality of diabetes prevention.